lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473876366.32273.40.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:06:06 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Minimize checkpatch induced patches...

On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 19:56 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:

> This will certainly help to reduce the noise. On the other hand I remember Linus
> saying something along the line that he does not like the -f parameter (and he
> prefers to set this automatically). So while I like the approach I am not happy
> enough to ack right now - still looking for a better alternative :-/

Linus likely hasn't used checkpatch in a decade or so.

Taste and judgment can't be scripted anyway.

Let me know if you find an alternative.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ