linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv5 0/6] x86: 32-bit compatible C/R on x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28071a1b-5f2e-be74-0408-8ec0e26957db@virtuozzo.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:56:10 +0300
From:   Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@...tuozzo.com>
To:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>
CC:     <0x7f454c46@...il.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/6] x86: 32-bit compatible C/R on x86_64

On 09/05/2016 04:33 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> Changes from v4:
> - check both vm_ops and vm_private_data to avoid (unlikely) confusion
>   with some other vma in map_vdso_once (as Andy noticed) - which would
>   lead to unable to use this API in that unlikely-case
>   (vm_private_data may be uninitialized and be the same as vvar_mapping
>   or vdso_mapping pointer) - so I introduced one-liner helper
>   vma_is_special_mapping().
>
> Changes from v3:
> - proper ifdefs around vdso_image_32
> - missed Reviewed-by tag

Ping?
It looks like, all acks are there and there are no objections.

-- 
              Dmitry