[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrWo2XcOvnWOwU4oS-pU1+KL2PnoHa0pdFX=PA3xeM7eqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:52:15 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mguzik@...hat.com>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@...tor.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
"Robert O'Callahan" <robert@...llahan.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl,x86 Add PR_[GET|SET]_CPUID for controlling the
CPUID instruction.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> You should explicitly check that, if the
>> feature is set under Xen PV, then the MSR actually works as
>> advertised. This may require talking to the Xen folks to make sure
>> you're testing the right configuration.
>
> This is interesting. When running under Xen PV the kernel is allowed
> to read the real value of MSR_PLATFORM_INFO and see that CPUID
> faulting is supported. But as you suggested, writing to
> MSR_MISC_FEATURES_ENABLES doesn't actually enable CPUID faulting, at
> least not in any way that works.
>
> It's not obvious to me how to test this, because when this feature
> works, CPUID only faults in userspace, not in the kernel. Is there
> existing code somewhere that runs tests like this in userspace?
>
Andrew, Boris: should we expect Xen PV to do anything sensible when we
write to MSR_PLATFORM_INFO to turn on CPUID faulting? Should the Xen
PV rdmsr hooks or perhaps the hypervisor mask out the feature if it
isn't going to be supported?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists