linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Xilinx NWL PCIe: Expanding PCIe core errors and printing event occurred.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8520D5D51A55D047800579B094147198258D616B@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 05:28:27 +0000
From:   Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:     "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "colin.king@...onical.com" <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
        "marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: Xilinx NWL PCIe: Expanding PCIe core errors
 and printing event occurred.

> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:09:16PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > The current driver prints pcie core error, for all core events.
> > Instead of just printing PCIe core error, now adding prints to show
> > individual core events occurred.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>
> 
> I applied the first two patches to pci/host-xilinx for v4.9, thanks!
> 
> I'd like to work on the third one a little more, as I mentioned in my response to
> it.
> 
Thanks Bjorn, yes I agree that third one needs better way of handling.