lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:06:01 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 16/17] stable_kernel_rules.rst: Add cross-references to other ReST files

Add two references for files that were already converted to ReST.

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
---
 Documentation/development-process/stable_kernel_rules.rst | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/development-process/stable_kernel_rules.rst b/Documentation/development-process/stable_kernel_rules.rst
index 533be00260e6..daa1073b65df 100644
--- a/Documentation/development-process/stable_kernel_rules.rst
+++ b/Documentation/development-process/stable_kernel_rules.rst
@@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
    race can be exploited is also provided.
  - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
    whitespace cleanups, etc).
- - It must follow the Documentation/development-process/SubmittingPatches.rst rules.
+ - It must follow the
+   :ref:`Documentation/development-process/SubmittingPatches.rst <submittingpatches>`
+   rules.
  - It or an equivalent fix must already exist in Linus' tree (upstream).
 
 
@@ -37,7 +39,8 @@ Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree
    submission guidelines as described in
    Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt
  - Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
-   process but should follow the procedures in Documentation/development-process/SecurityBugs.rst.
+   process but should follow the procedures in
+   :ref:`Documentation/development-process/SecurityBugs.rst <securitybugs>`.
 
 For all other submissions, choose one of the following procedures
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
2.7.4


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ