[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQ_ZPT+YKcJmp60mLSy+72Fh7abJjKbL5BFRvsbQzPpfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 18:48:36 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
"Christian K?nig" <christian.koenig@....com>,
Alexander Deucher <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: use i915_gem_open() directly instead of i915_driver_open()
2016-09-15 18:46 GMT+09:00 Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>:
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>> i915_driver_open() is equivalent to i915_gem_open(). Replace the
>> i915_driver_open with the direct use of i915_gem_open().
>
> Sorry I know I asked for this, but there was opposition to doing
> this. Please just do the return i915_gem_open(dev, file) version like
> you had originally.
Sure.
(I was also wondering if it is the right thing to do.)
I will send v3.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists