lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6210143.TgbX7tJ4uj@wuerfel>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:28:31 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        tony@...mide.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] mfd: max8997-irq: 'inline' should be at the beginning of the declaration

On Thursday, September 15, 2016 11:45:15 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote:
> -static const inline struct max8997_irq_data *
> +inline static const struct max8997_irq_data *

I think this causes another warning, the order should be
"stastic inline const struct max8997_irq_data".

	Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ