[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160915115814.GB24676@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 13:58:15 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, WingMan Kwok <w-kwok2@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] net: ethernet: ti: cpts: calc mult and shift from
refclk freq
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:26:19PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:29PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > + clocks_calc_mult_shift(&mult, &shift, freq, NSEC_PER_SEC, maxsec);
> > +
> > + cpts->cc_mult = mult;
> > + cpts->cc.mult = mult;
>
> In order to get good resolution on the frequency adjustment, we want
> to keep 'mult' as large as possible. I don't see your code doing
> this. We can rely on the watchdog reader (work queue) to prevent
> overflows.
I took a closer look, and assuming cc.mask = 2^32 - 1, then using
clocks_calc_mult_shift() produces good results for a reasonable range
of input frequencies. Keeping 'maxsec' constant at 4 we have:
| Freq. MHz | mult | shift |
|-----------+------------+-------|
| 100 | 0xa0000000 | 28 |
| 250 | 0x80000000 | 29 |
| 500 | 0x80000000 | 30 |
| 1000 | 0x80000000 | 31 |
Can the input clock be higher than 1 GHz? If not, I suggest using
clocks_calc_mult_shift() with maxsec=4 and a setting the watchdog also
to 4*HZ.
Thanks,
Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists