linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7884d730-1d65-73c0-b94d-196bda3211d5@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:33:57 +0200
From:   Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: replace broken specification URL

Hi Martin,

On 14/09/2016 19:00, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Michael> So, should we only that the cam-r12b document can be found from
> Michael> http://www.t10.org/t10docs.htm (registration required)?, and
> Michael> tell that a copy can be found on
> Michael> http://www.csit-sun.pub.ro/~cpop/Documentatie_SMP/Standarde_magistrale/SCSI/?
>
> As inconvenient as the T10/ANSI restrictions are, we should not be
> linking to illegitimate spec repositories.

I agree with you. The documents do not allow copy without permission, so 
the copies we found are illegitimate indeed.

Now I know what patch to send, to get rid of the broken link :)

Thanks,

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com