linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7 v3] sched: propagate load during synchronous attach/detach

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB_Yt7j=vMPzo7dBNHdmMm9bUvFmQXezqhdHPgUYitQ7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:01:43 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
        Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
        Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7 v3] sched: propagate load during synchronous attach/detach

On 15 September 2016 at 14:55, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:47:49AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>  +/* Take into account change of utilization of a child task group */
>> +static inline void
>> +update_tg_cfs_util(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>> +{
>> +     struct cfs_rq *gcfs_rq =  group_cfs_rq(se);
>> +     long delta = gcfs_rq->avg.util_avg - se->avg.util_avg;
>> +
>> +     /* Nothing to update */
>> +     if (!delta)
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     /* Set new sched_entity's utilizaton */
>> +     se->avg.util_avg = gcfs_rq->avg.util_avg;
>> +     se->avg.util_sum = se->avg.util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>> +
>> +     /* Update parent cfs_rq utilization */
>> +     cfs_rq->avg.util_avg =  max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.util_avg + delta, 0);
>
> This..
>
>> +     cfs_rq->avg.util_sum = cfs_rq->avg.util_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Take into account change of load of a child task group */
>> +static inline void
>> +update_tg_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>> +{
>> +     struct cfs_rq *gcfs_rq = group_cfs_rq(se);
>> +     long delta, load = gcfs_rq->avg.load_avg;
>> +
>> +     /* If the load of group cfs_rq is null, the load of the
>> +      * sched_entity will also be null so we can skip the formula
>> +      */
>> +     if (load) {
>> +             long tg_load;
>> +
>> +             /* Get tg's load and ensure tg_load > 0 */
>> +             tg_load = atomic_long_read(&gcfs_rq->tg->load_avg) + 1;
>> +
>> +             /* Ensure tg_load >= load and updated with current load*/
>> +             tg_load -= gcfs_rq->tg_load_avg_contrib;
>> +             tg_load += load;
>> +
>> +             /* scale gcfs_rq's load into tg's shares*/
>> +             load *= scale_load_down(gcfs_rq->tg->shares);
>> +             load /= tg_load;
>> +
>> +             /*
>> +              * we need to compute a correction term in the case that the
>> +              * task group is consuming <1 cpu so that we would contribute
>> +              * the same load as a task of equal weight.
>> +             */
>> +             if (tg_load < scale_load_down(gcfs_rq->tg->shares)) {
>> +                     load *= tg_load;
>> +                     load /= scale_load_down(gcfs_rq->tg->shares);
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     delta = load - se->avg.load_avg;
>> +
>> +     /* Nothing to update */
>> +     if (!delta)
>> +             return;
>> +
>> +     /* Set new sched_entity's load */
>> +     se->avg.load_avg = load;
>> +     se->avg.load_sum = se->avg.load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>> +
>> +     /* Update parent cfs_rq load */
>> +     cfs_rq->avg.load_avg = max_t(long, cfs_rq->avg.load_avg + delta, 0);
>
> And this..
>
>> +     cfs_rq->avg.load_sum = cfs_rq->avg.load_avg * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
>> +}
>
> Re-introduce the issue from: 897418922215 ("sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq avg
> tracking underflow").


Yes sorry, i forgot this point. I will use sub_positive instead