lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:25:03 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Andrey Utkin <andrey_utkin@...tmail.com>
Cc:     Andrey Utkin <andrey.utkin@...p.bluecherry.net>,
        Krzysztof HaƂasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Ismael Luceno <ismael@...ev.co.uk>,
        Bluecherry Maintainers <maintainers@...echerrydvr.com>
Subject: Re: solo6010 modprobe lockup since e1ceb25a (v4.3 regression)

On 09/15/2016 03:19 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 03:15:53PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> It could be related to the fact that a PCI write may be delayed unless
>> it is followed by a read (see also the comments in drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-driver.h).
> 
> Thanks for explanation!
> 
>> That was probably the reason for the pci_read_config_word in the reg_write
>> code. Try putting that back (and just that).
> 
> In this case reg_write becomes not atomic, thus spinlock would be
> required again here, right?

That depends on whether you can have calls to this function in parallel.

But I get the feeling that it might be easier to just revert the patch.

Regards,

	Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ