[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4542776.bqQjVnlNjh@hactar>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:51:36 -0300
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] kexec_file: Include the purgatory segment in the kexec image checksum.
Hello Stephen,
Am Donnerstag, 15 September 2016, 11:43:08 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi Thiago,
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > index 2a1f0ce7c59a..dcd1679f3005 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > @@ -1792,6 +1792,11 @@ config SECCOMP
> >
> > source kernel/Kconfig.hz
> >
> > +# x86 needs to relocate the purgatory after the checksum is calculated,
> > +# therefore the purgatory cannot be part of the kexec image checksum.
> > +config ARCH_MODIFIES_KEXEC_PURGATORY
> > + bool
> > +
>
> The above should probably be in arch/Kconfig (with an appropriately
> changed comment) since it is used in generic code.
Thanks for your quick response! I'll make that change tomorrow and send an
updated version of just this patch.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists