[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160915132944.10331-4-alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:29:44 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org#4.7
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf/x86/intel/pt: Do validate the size of a kernel address filter
Right now, the kernel address filters in PT are prone to integer overflow
that may happen in adding filter's size to its offset to obtain the end
of the range. Such an overflow would also throw a #GP in the PT event
configuration path.
Fix this by explicitly validating the result of this calculation.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.7
Reported-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
index 5ec0100e3f..834ce06b00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/pt.c
@@ -1084,8 +1084,13 @@ static int pt_event_addr_filters_validate(struct list_head *filters)
if (!filter->range || !filter->size)
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
- if (!filter->inode && !kernel_ip(filter->offset))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!filter->inode) {
+ if (!kernel_ip(filter->offset))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (!kernel_ip(filter->offset + filter->size))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
if (++range > pt_cap_get(PT_CAP_num_address_ranges))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists