[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b71b38ff-f0d0-83c6-6066-195180b08ea0@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 15:08:00 +0100
From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>,
<jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] wd719x: Avoid calling request_firmware under
spinlock
On 15/09/2016 14:48, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> It is preferrable to use request_firmware where sleeping is
> allowed. Using it under spinlock can cause blocking. Here,
> the function wd719x_chip_init calls request_firmware while
> holding a spinlock. So, let's access it outside the spinlock.
>
> Coccinelle is used to detect the issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>
> ---
> Please note that the patch is compile-tested only. And this change
> may require driver testing.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/wd719x.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c b/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
> index e3da1a2..b8e57f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/wd719x.c
> @@ -518,13 +518,14 @@ static int wd719x_host_reset(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> int result;
>
> dev_info(&wd->pdev->dev, "host reset requested\n");
> - spin_lock_irqsave(wd->sh->host_lock, flags);
> +
In the version of code I have flags is only used for this spinlock, so
can flags be removed?
> /* Try to reinit the RISC */
> if (wd719x_chip_init(wd) == 0)
> result = SUCCESS;
> else
> result = FAILED;
>
> + spin_lock_irqsave(wd->sh->host_lock, flags);
> /* flush all SCBs */
> list_for_each_entry_safe(scb, tmp, &wd->active_scbs, list) {
> struct scsi_cmnd *tmp_cmd = scb->cmd;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists