| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1473898163.3205.32.camel@themaw.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:09:23 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
autofs mailing list <autofs@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] autofs - make mountpoint checks namespace aware
On Wed, 2016-09-14 at 12:28 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> writes:
>
> > If an automount mount is clone(2)ed into a file system that is
> > propagation private, when it later expires in the originating
> > namespace subsequent calls to autofs ->d_automount() for that
> > dentry in the original namespace will return ELOOP until the
> > mount is manually umounted in the cloned namespace.
> >
> > In the same way, if an autofs mount is triggered by automount(8)
> > running within a container the dentry will be seen as mounted in
> > the root init namespace and calls to ->d_automount() in that namespace
> > will return ELOOP until the mount is umounted within the container.
> >
> > Also, have_submounts() can return an incorect result when a mount
> > exists in a namespace other than the one being checked.
>
> Overall this appears to be a fairly reasonable set of changes. It does
> increase the expense when an actual mount point is encountered, but if
> these are the desired some increase in cost when a dentry is a
> mountpoint is unavoidable.
>
> May I ask the motiviation for this set of changes? Reading through the
> changes I don't grasp why we want to change the behavior of autofs.
> What problem is being solved? What are the benefits?
LOL, it's all too easy for me to give a patch description that I think explains
a problem I need to solve without realizing it isn't clear to others what the
problem is, sorry about that.
For quite a while now, and not that frequently but consistently, I've been
getting reports of people using autofs getting ELOOP errors and not being able
to mount automounts.
This has been due to the cloning of autofs file systems (that have active
automounts at the time of the clone) by other systems.
An unshare, as one example, can easily result in the cloning of an autofs file
system that has active mounts which shows this problem.
Once an active mount that has been cloned is expired in the namespace that
performed the unshare it can't be (auto)mounted again in the the originating
namespace because the mounted check in the autofs module will think it is
already mounted.
I'm not sure this is a clear description either, hopefully it is enough to
demonstrate the type of problem I'm typing to solve.
> Eric
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> > Cc: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
> > ---
> > fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c | 2 +-
> > fs/autofs4/expire.c | 4 ++--
> > fs/autofs4/root.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > fs/autofs4/waitq.c | 2 +-
> > 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > index c7fcc74..0024e25 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/dev-ioctl.c
> > @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int autofs_dev_ioctl_ismountpoint(struct file
> > *fp,
> >
> > devid = new_encode_dev(dev);
> >
> > - err = have_submounts(path.dentry);
> > + err = have_local_submounts(path.dentry);
> >
> > if (follow_down_one(&path))
> > magic = path.dentry->d_sb->s_magic;
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/expire.c b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > index d8e6d42..7cc34ef 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/expire.c
> > @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int autofs4_tree_busy(struct vfsmount *mnt,
> > * count for the autofs dentry.
> > * If the fs is busy update the expiry counter.
> > */
> > - if (d_mountpoint(p)) {
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(p)) {
> > if (autofs4_mount_busy(mnt, p)) {
> > top_ino->last_used = jiffies;
> > dput(p);
> > @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static struct dentry *autofs4_check_leaves(struct
> > vfsmount *mnt,
> > while ((p = get_next_positive_dentry(p, parent))) {
> > pr_debug("dentry %p %pd\n", p, p);
> >
> > - if (d_mountpoint(p)) {
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(p)) {
> > /* Can we umount this guy */
> > if (autofs4_mount_busy(mnt, p))
> > continue;
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/root.c b/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > index fa84bb8..4150ad6 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/root.c
> > @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int autofs4_dir_open(struct inode *inode, struct
> > file *file)
> > * it.
> > */
> > spin_lock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry) && simple_empty(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->lookup_lock);
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> > @@ -370,28 +370,28 @@ static struct vfsmount *autofs4_d_automount(struct
> > path *path)
> >
> > /*
> > * If the dentry is a symlink it's equivalent to a directory
> > - * having d_mountpoint() true, so there's no need to call back
> > - * to the daemon.
> > + * having is_local_mountpoint() true, so there's no need to
> > + * call back to the daemon.
> > */
> > if (d_really_is_positive(dentry) && d_is_symlink(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
> > goto done;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry)) {
> > /*
> > * It's possible that user space hasn't removed directories
> > * after umounting a rootless multi-mount, although it
> > - * should. For v5 have_submounts() is sufficient to handle
> > - * this because the leaves of the directory tree under the
> > - * mount never trigger mounts themselves (they have an
> > autofs
> > - * trigger mount mounted on them). But v4 pseudo direct
> > mounts
> > - * do need the leaves to trigger mounts. In this case we
> > - * have no choice but to use the list_empty() check and
> > - * require user space behave.
> > + * should. For v5 have_local_submounts() is sufficient to
> > + * handle this because the leaves of the directory tree
> > under
> > + * the mount never trigger mounts themselves (they have an
> > + * autofs trigger mount mounted on them). But v4 pseudo
> > + * direct mounts do need the leaves to trigger mounts. In
> > + * this case we have no choice but to use the list_empty()
> > + * check and require user space behave.
> > */
> > if (sbi->version > 4) {
> > - if (have_submounts(dentry)) {
> > + if (have_local_submounts(dentry)) {
> > spin_unlock(&sbi->fs_lock);
> > goto done;
> > }
> > @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> >
> > /* The daemon never waits. */
> > if (autofs4_oz_mode(sbi)) {
> > - if (!d_mountpoint(dentry))
> > + if (!is_local_mountpoint(dentry))
> > return -EISDIR;
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -460,7 +460,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> >
> > if (ino->flags & AUTOFS_INF_WANT_EXPIRE)
> > return 0;
> > - if (d_mountpoint(dentry))
> > + if (is_local_mountpoint(dentry))
> > return 0;
> > inode = d_inode_rcu(dentry);
> > if (inode && S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode))
> > @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ static int autofs4_d_manage(struct dentry *dentry, bool
> > rcu_walk)
> > * we can avoid needless calls ->d_automount() and avoid
> > * an incorrect ELOOP error return.
> > */
> > - if ((!d_mountpoint(dentry) && !simple_empty(dentry)) ||
> > + if ((!is_local_mountpoint(dentry) && !simple_empty(dentry))
> > ||
> > (d_really_is_positive(dentry) && d_is_symlink(dentry)))
> > status = -EISDIR;
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > index 431fd7e..911f4d5 100644
> > --- a/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > +++ b/fs/autofs4/waitq.c
> > @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ static int validate_request(struct autofs_wait_queue
> > **wait,
> > dentry = new;
> > }
> > }
> > - if (have_submounts(dentry))
> > + if (have_local_submounts(dentry))
> > valid = 0;
> >
> > if (new)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists