[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d3f1810c-e97a-4460-1415-f54e8501cf64@lechnology.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 10:31:50 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@...sung.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] leds: Introduce userspace leds driver
On 09/15/2016 09:54 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> On 09/15/2016 03:08 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&udev->user_dev, buffer,
>>>> + sizeof(struct uleds_user_dev))) {
>>>> + ret = -EFAULT;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!udev->user_dev.name[0]) {
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto out;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = led_classdev_register(NULL, &udev->led_cdev);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + goto out;
>>
>> No sanity checking on the name -> probably a security hole. Do not
>> push this upstream before this is fixed.
>
> Thanks for catching this.
>
> David, please check if the LED name sticks to the LED class
> device naming convention.
I don't think it is a good idea to enforce the LED class naming
convention. Someone may have a userspace application they want to test
that has a hard-coded name that does not follow the convention.
>
> And one thing that caught my eye only now - please use
> devm_led_classdev_register().
How do I use devm_* when there is no parent device?
>
> For now I'm dropping the patch.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists