linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160915201939.GB3200@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:19:39 -0300
From:   Marcelo <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     vyasevich@...il.com, nhorman@...driver.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: Remove some redundant code

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:32:18PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 15/09/2016 à 19:34, Marcelo a écrit :
> > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 11:38:13AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > > In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
> > > to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
> > > hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
> > > 
> > > Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
> > > 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do the same.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> > I just noticed you didn't include netdev@ in the destinations.
> > 
> > Is your patch going to be tracked somewhere else? It's not showing up in
> > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?submitter=66309&state=*&q=&archive=&delegate=
> > 
> My fault, get_maintainer lists netdev@ but I missed it.
> 
> Should I resubmit or is it ok?

I guess you need to resubmit then, as it's not showing up in patchwork.

  Marcelo