linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 00/21] blk-mq: Introduce combined hardware queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160916101015.GD2476@agordeev.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:10:16 +0200
From:   Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/21] blk-mq: Introduce combined hardware queues

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 02:27:43AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
> this clashes badly with the my queue mapping rework that went into
> Jens tree recently.

Yeah, I fully aware the RFC-marked patches would clash with your
works. I will surely rework them if the proposal considered worthwhile.

> But in the meantime: there seem to be lots of little bugfixes and
> cleanups in the series, any chance you could send them out as a first
> series while updating the rest?

[He-he :) I can even see you removed map_queue() as well]
I will rebase the cleanups on top of your tree.

> Also please Cc the linux-block list for block layer patches that don't
> even seem to touch the nvme driver.

Just wanted let NVMe people know, as this h/w is presumably main
beneficiary.

Thanks!