[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bfcc6841-b5a7-8e40-5a6b-9e64f42390d7@nod.at>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 12:14:04 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] UBI: simplify recover_peb() code
Boris,
On 05.09.2016 17:05, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> + * This function is called in case of a write failure and moves all good data
> + * from the potentially bad physical eraseblock to a good physical eraseblock.
> + * This function also writes the data which was not written due to the failure.
> + * Returns 0 in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
> + * This function tries %UBI_IO_RETRIES before giving up.
> + */
> +static int recover_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int vol_id, int lnum,
> + const void *buf, int offset, int len)
> +{
> + int err, idx = vol_id2idx(ubi, vol_id), tries;
> + struct ubi_volume *vol = ubi->volumes[idx];
> + struct ubi_vid_hdr *vid_hdr;
> +
> + vid_hdr = ubi_zalloc_vid_hdr(ubi, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!vid_hdr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (tries = 0; tries <= UBI_IO_RETRIES; tries++) {
> + err = try_recover_peb(vol, pnum, lnum, buf, offset, len,
> + vid_hdr);
> + if (!err || err == -ENOSPC)
> + break;
Why do you handle ENOSPC as fatal error? Since the loop is bound by UBI_IO_RETRIES
IMHO we can retry also upon ENOSPC.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists