[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160916103034.GX27974@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 11:30:34 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Koji Matsuoka <koji.matsuoka.xm@...esas.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Simon <horms@...ge.net.au>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2][resend] drm: bridge: add DesignWare HDMI I2S
audio support
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 08:01:01AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> Can I have feedback about this patch ?
These are DRM patches, I'd expect them to go via the DRM subsystem.
Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in
doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists