[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160916121740.GA18021@node.shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:17:40 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 29/41] ext4: make ext4_mpage_readpages() hugepage-aware
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 06:27:10AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 5:55 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch modifies ext4_mpage_readpages() to deal with huge pages.
> >
> > We read out 2M at once, so we have to alloc (HPAGE_PMD_NR *
> > blocks_per_page) sector_t for that. I'm not entirely happy with kmalloc
> > in this codepath, but don't see any other option.
>
> If you're reading 2MB from disk (possibly from disjoint blocks with seeks
> in between) I don't think that the kmalloc() is going to be the limiting
> performance factor. If you are concerned about the size of the kmalloc()
> causing failures when pages are fragmented (it can be 16KB for 1KB blocks
> with 4KB pages), then using ext4_kvmalloc() to fall back to vmalloc() in
> case kmalloc() fails. It shouldn't fail often for 16KB allocations,
> but it could in theory.
Good point. Will use ext4_kvmalloc().
> I also notice that ext4_kvmalloc() should probably use unlikely() for
> the failure case, so that the uncommon vmalloc() fallback is out-of-line
> in this more important codepath. The only other callers are during mount,
> so a branch misprediction is not critical.
I agree. But it's out-of-scope for the patchset.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists