[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a157cb6b-9743-4c63-d5d4-3f7d467f1b59@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 15:44:30 +0300
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, acme@...nel.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
acme@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/3] perf tools: adding support for address filters
On 15/09/16 19:37, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> This patch makes it possible to use the current filter
> framework with address filters. That way address filters for
> HW tracers such as CoreSight and IntelPT can be communicated
IntelPT -> Intel PT
> to the kernel drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Otherwise:
Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 5 +++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 2 ++
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index a99e82d97df2..e0bb399dcdd4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1067,6 +1067,11 @@ int perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter)
> return perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "(%s) && (%s)", filter);
> }
>
> +int perf_evsel__append_addr_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter)
> +{
> + return perf_evsel__append_filter(evsel, "%s,%s", filter);
> +}
> +
> int perf_evsel__enable(struct perf_evsel *evsel)
> {
> int nthreads = thread_map__nr(evsel->threads);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> index 36ed0997e65b..49c51fb3d05c 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ void perf_evsel__set_sample_id(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
>
> int perf_evsel__set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter);
> int perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const char *filter);
> +int perf_evsel__append_addr_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> + const char *filter);
> int perf_evsel__apply_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads,
> const char *filter);
> int perf_evsel__enable(struct perf_evsel *evsel);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> index 751b48fc641c..c23f2d5fc134 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
> @@ -1755,20 +1755,49 @@ foreach_evsel_in_last_glob(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
> static int set_filter(struct perf_evsel *evsel, const void *arg)
> {
> const char *str = arg;
> + bool found = false;
> + int nr_addr_filters = 0;
> + struct perf_pmu *pmu = NULL;
>
> - if (evsel == NULL || evsel->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
> - fprintf(stderr,
> - "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint option\n");
> - return -1;
> + if (evsel == NULL)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (evsel->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT) {
> + if (perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(evsel, str) < 0) {
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> - if (perf_evsel__append_tp_filter(evsel, str) < 0) {
> + while ((pmu = perf_pmu__scan(pmu)) != NULL)
> + if (pmu->type == evsel->attr.type) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (found)
> + perf_pmu__scan_file(pmu, "nr_addr_filters",
> + "%d", &nr_addr_filters);
> +
> + if (!nr_addr_filters)
> + goto err;
> +
> + if (perf_evsel__append_addr_filter(evsel, str) < 0) {
> fprintf(stderr,
> "not enough memory to hold filter string\n");
> return -1;
> }
>
> return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + fprintf(stderr,
> + "--filter option should follow a -e tracepoint or HW tracer option\n");
> +
> + return -1;
> }
>
> int parse_filter(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists