[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVr2hTd=-gX8oVSL_AR3WX1rpp9B+9EXswE7c1J6rF8FA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 08:13:31 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] nvme: Pass pointers, not dma addresses, to nvme_get/set_features()
On Sep 16, 2016 1:41 AM, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:24:20PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > Any user I can imagine that needs a buffer at all will want to pass
> > a pointer directly. There are no currently callers that use
> > buffers, so this change is painless, and it will make it much easier
> > to start using features that use buffers (e.g. APST).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> > ---
>
> Looks good mostly good, but a nitpick below:
>
> > + /*
> > + * Casting buffer to void* is safe here: __nvme_submit_sync_cmd knows
> > + * that we're writing because it decodes the opcode.
> > + */
> > + ret = __nvme_submit_sync_cmd(dev->admin_q, &c, &cqe,
> > + (void *)buffer, buflen, 0, NVME_QID_ANY, 0, 0);
>
> Cant we just drop the const annotation to avoid these casts?
>
Then we'd have nvme_set_feature() taking a non-const pointer, which
would seem a little bit silly to me and might require the same cast
somewhere else down the road.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists