[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2296a3a9-164a-c46c-ef98-2bd2d97039c8@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:48:08 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: msm8996-pcie-phy: Add support to msm8996 pcie
phy
On 13/09/16 17:06, Archit Taneja wrote:
>
>
> On 9/7/2016 4:25 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> This patch adds support to msm8996 pcie phy which supports 3 ports,
>> Port A, Port B and Port C.
>>
>> Each port is independent and connected to a pcie host controller,
>> there is
>> also a common block which is shared across all the 3 ports.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 +
>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/phy/phy-qcom-msm8996-pcie.c | 492
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> +#define PCIE_LANE_PCS_BASE 0x1400
>
> I've seen the reg offsets of another SoC using the same
> IP, but the above offsets aren't the same relative to the
> phy base. We might want to create more reg properties in
> DT to accommodate register maps on other SoCs.
Yep, I got some more info on this from Vivek and It looks like this IP
has been reused on other Host controllers and SOCs.
So plan is to write a common driver for all of them.
Thanks,
srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists