[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160916200207.21439-10-yinghai@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:01:59 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <weiyang@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v14 09/17] sparc/PCI: Keep resource idx order with bridge register number
On one system found strange "no compatible bridge window" warning
even we already had pref_compat support that add extra pref bit for device
resource.
PCI: Claiming 0000:00:01.0: Resource 14: 0002000100000000..000200010fffffff [10220c]
PCI: Claiming 0000:01:00.0: Resource 1: 0002000100000000..000200010000ffff [100214]
pci 0000:01:00.0: can't claim BAR 1 [mem 0x2000100000000-0x200010000ffff 64bit]: no compatible bridge window
It turns out that pci_resource_compatible()/pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64()
just check resource with bridge pref mmio register idx 15, and we have put
resource to use mmio register idx 14 during of_scan_pci_bridge()
as the bridge does not have mmio resource.
We already fix pci_up_path_over_pref_mem64() to check all bus resources.
And at the same time, this patch make resource to have consistent sequence
like other arch or directly from pci_read_bridge_bases(),
even when non-pref mmio is missing, or out of ordering in firmware reporting.
Just hold i = 1 for non pref mmio, and i = 2 for pref mmio.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Tested-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
---
arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 654cf21..c6a3971 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
pci_read_bridge_bases(bus);
goto after_ranges;
}
- i = 1;
+ i = 3;
for (; len >= 32; len -= 32, ranges += 8) {
u64 start;
@@ -513,6 +513,12 @@ static void of_scan_pci_bridge(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
" for bridge %s\n", node->full_name);
continue;
}
+ } else if ((flags & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) &&
+ !bus->resource[2]->flags) {
+ res = bus->resource[2];
+ } else if (((flags & (IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_PREFETCH)) ==
+ IORESOURCE_MEM) && !bus->resource[1]->flags) {
+ res = bus->resource[1];
} else {
if (i >= PCI_NUM_RESOURCES - PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) {
printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: too many memory ranges"
--
2.8.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists