linux-kernel - [RFC v7 03/23] clocksource: em_sti: split clock prepare and enable steps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160916200851.9273-4-nicstange@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:08:31 +0200
From:   Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC v7 03/23] clocksource: em_sti: split clock prepare and enable steps

Currently, the em_sti driver prepares and enables the needed clock in
em_sti_enable(), potentially called through its clockevent device's
->set_state_oneshot().

However, the clk_prepare() step may sleep whereas tick_program_event() and
thus, ->set_state_oneshot(), can be called in atomic context.

Split the clk_prepare_enable() in em_sti_enable() into two steps:
- prepare the clock at device probing via clk_prepare()
- and enable it in em_sti_enable() via clk_enable().
Slightly reorder resource initialization in em_sti_probe() in order to
facilitate error handling.

Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>
---

Notes:
    Compile-only tested on ARCH=arm.

 drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
index 19bb179..46750c0 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/em_sti.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int em_sti_enable(struct em_sti_priv *p)
 	int ret;
 
 	/* enable clock */
-	ret = clk_prepare_enable(p->clk);
+	ret = clk_enable(p->clk);
 	if (ret) {
 		dev_err(&p->pdev->dev, "cannot enable clock\n");
 		return ret;
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void em_sti_disable(struct em_sti_priv *p)
 	em_sti_write(p, STI_INTENCLR, 3);
 
 	/* stop clock */
-	clk_disable_unprepare(p->clk);
+	clk_disable(p->clk);
 }
 
 static cycle_t em_sti_count(struct em_sti_priv *p)
@@ -303,6 +303,7 @@ static int em_sti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct em_sti_priv *p;
 	struct resource *res;
 	int irq;
+	int ret;
 
 	p = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (p == NULL)
@@ -323,6 +324,13 @@ static int em_sti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (IS_ERR(p->base))
 		return PTR_ERR(p->base);
 
+	if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, em_sti_interrupt,
+			     IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+			     dev_name(&pdev->dev), p)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request low IRQ\n");
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
 	/* get hold of clock */
 	p->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sclk");
 	if (IS_ERR(p->clk)) {
@@ -330,17 +338,20 @@ static int em_sti_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(p->clk);
 	}
 
-	if (devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, em_sti_interrupt,
-			     IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_IRQPOLL | IRQF_NOBALANCING,
-			     dev_name(&pdev->dev), p)) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request low IRQ\n");
-		return -ENOENT;
+	ret = clk_prepare(p->clk);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot prepare clock\n");
+		goto err_clk_put;
 	}
 
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&p->lock);
 	em_sti_register_clockevent(p);
 	em_sti_register_clocksource(p);
 	return 0;
+
+err_clk_put:
+	clk_put(p->clk);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int em_sti_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.10.0