[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1474221559-21269-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 02:59:19 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: w90x900: let clk_disable() return immediately if clk is NULL
In many of clk_disable() implementations, it is a no-op for a NULL
pointer input, but this is one of the exceptions.
Making it treewide consistent will allow clock consumers to call
clk_disable() without NULL pointer check.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@...il.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- Split into per-arch patches
Changes in v3:
- Return only when clk is NULL. Do not take care of error pointer.
Changes in v2:
- Rebase on Linux 4.6-rc1
arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
index 2c371ff..ac6fd1a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-w90x900/clock.c
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
WARN_ON(clk->enabled == 0);
spin_lock_irqsave(&clocks_lock, flags);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists