Message-Id: <f5ff462baa70b6ab7e55aecc48b18238a2dce685.1474280152.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:08:01 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 27/29] Documentation/SubmitChecklist: convert it to ReST markup

- use ``foo`` to markup inline literal stuff, effectively making it
  to be presented as a monospaced font when parsed by Sphinx;

- the markup below the title should have the same length as the
  title;

- Fix the list markups, from "1:" to "1)";

- Split item 2 into a separate list for the build options, in order
  to be presented as a list on Sphinx;

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
---
 Documentation/SubmitChecklist | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmitChecklist b/Documentation/SubmitChecklist
index bb114c8a781c..22a370ff34e5 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmitChecklist
+++ b/Documentation/SubmitChecklist
@@ -1,110 +1,118 @@
 Linux Kernel patch submission checklist
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 Here are some basic things that developers should do if they want to see their
 kernel patch submissions accepted more quickly.
 
 These are all above and beyond the documentation that is provided in
-Documentation/SubmittingPatches and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux
-kernel patches.
+Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+and elsewhere regarding submitting Linux kernel patches.
 
 
-1: If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
+1) If you use a facility then #include the file that defines/declares
    that facility.  Don't depend on other header files pulling in ones
    that you use.
 
-2: Builds cleanly with applicable or modified CONFIG options =y, =m, and
-   =n.  No gcc warnings/errors, no linker warnings/errors.
+2) Builds cleanly:
 
-2b: Passes allnoconfig, allmodconfig
+  a) with applicable or modified ``CONFIG`` options ``=y``, ``=m``, and
+     ``=n``.  No ``gcc`` warnings/errors, no linker warnings/errors.
 
-2c: Builds successfully when using O=builddir
+  b) Passes ``allnoconfig``, ``allmodconfig``
 
-3: Builds on multiple CPU architectures by using local cross-compile tools
+  c) Builds successfully when using ``O=builddir``
+
+3) Builds on multiple CPU architectures by using local cross-compile tools
    or some other build farm.
 
-4: ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it
-   tends to use `unsigned long' for 64-bit quantities.
+4) ppc64 is a good architecture for cross-compilation checking because it
+   tends to use ``unsigned long`` for 64-bit quantities.
 
 5: Check your patch for general style as detailed in
-   Documentation/CodingStyle.  Check for trivial violations with the
-   patch style checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl).
+   Documentation/CodingStyle.
+   Check for trivial violations with the patch style checker prior to
+   submission (``scripts/checkpatch.pl``).
    You should be able to justify all violations that remain in
    your patch.
 
-6: Any new or modified CONFIG options don't muck up the config menu.
+6) Any new or modified ``CONFIG`` options don't muck up the config menu.
 
-7: All new Kconfig options have help text.
+7) All new ``Kconfig`` options have help text.
 
-8: Has been carefully reviewed with respect to relevant Kconfig
+8) Has been carefully reviewed with respect to relevant ``Kconfig``
    combinations.  This is very hard to get right with testing -- brainpower
    pays off here.
 
-9: Check cleanly with sparse.
+9) Check cleanly with sparse.
 
-10: Use 'make checkstack' and 'make namespacecheck' and fix any problems
-    that they find.  Note: checkstack does not point out problems explicitly,
-    but any one function that uses more than 512 bytes on the stack is a
-    candidate for change.
+10) Use ``make checkstack`` and ``make namespacecheck`` and fix any problems
+    that they find.
+
+    .. note::
+
+       ``checkstack`` does not point out problems explicitly,
+       but any one function that uses more than 512 bytes on the stack is a
+       candidate for change.
 
 11: Include :ref:`kernel-doc <kernel_doc>` to document global  kernel APIs.
     (Not required for static functions, but OK there also.) Use
     ``make htmldocs`` or ``make pdfdocs`` to check the
     :ref:`kernel-doc <kernel_doc>` and fix any issues.
 
-12: Has been tested with CONFIG_PREEMPT, CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT,
-    CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB, CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES,
-    CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK, CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
-    and CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD all simultaneously enabled.
+12) Has been tested with ``CONFIG_PREEMPT``, ``CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT``,
+    ``CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB``, ``CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC``, ``CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES``,
+    ``CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK``, ``CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP``,
+    ``CONFIG_PROVE_RCU`` and ``CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD`` all
+    simultaneously enabled.
 
-13: Has been build- and runtime tested with and without CONFIG_SMP and
-    CONFIG_PREEMPT.
+13) Has been build- and runtime tested with and without ``CONFIG_SMP`` and
+    ``CONFIG_PREEMPT.``
 
-14: If the patch affects IO/Disk, etc: has been tested with and without
-    CONFIG_LBDAF.
+14) If the patch affects IO/Disk, etc: has been tested with and without
+    ``CONFIG_LBDAF.``
 
-15: All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled.
+15) All codepaths have been exercised with all lockdep features enabled.
 
-16: All new /proc entries are documented under Documentation/
+16) All new ``/proc`` entries are documented under ``Documentation/``
 
-17: All new kernel boot parameters are documented in
-    Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt.
+17) All new kernel boot parameters are documented in
+    ``Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt``.
 
-18: All new module parameters are documented with MODULE_PARM_DESC()
+18) All new module parameters are documented with ``MODULE_PARM_DESC()``
 
-19: All new userspace interfaces are documented in Documentation/ABI/.
-    See Documentation/ABI/README for more information.
+19) All new userspace interfaces are documented in ``Documentation/ABI/``.
+    See ``Documentation/ABI/README`` for more information.
     Patches that change userspace interfaces should be CCed to
     linux-api@...r.kernel.org.
 
-20: Check that it all passes `make headers_check'.
+20) Check that it all passes ``make headers_check``.
 
-21: Has been checked with injection of at least slab and page-allocation
-    failures.  See Documentation/fault-injection/.
+21) Has been checked with injection of at least slab and page-allocation
+    failures.  See ``Documentation/fault-injection/``.
 
     If the new code is substantial, addition of subsystem-specific fault
     injection might be appropriate.
 
-22: Newly-added code has been compiled with `gcc -W' (use "make
-    EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W").  This will generate lots of noise, but is good for
-    finding bugs like "warning: comparison between signed and unsigned".
+22) Newly-added code has been compiled with ``gcc -W`` (use
+    ``make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W``).  This will generate lots of noise, but is good
+    for finding bugs like "warning: comparison between signed and unsigned".
 
-23: Tested after it has been merged into the -mm patchset to make sure
+23) Tested after it has been merged into the -mm patchset to make sure
     that it still works with all of the other queued patches and various
     changes in the VM, VFS, and other subsystems.
 
-24: All memory barriers {e.g., barrier(), rmb(), wmb()} need a comment in the
-    source code that explains the logic of what they are doing and why.
+24) All memory barriers {e.g., ``barrier()``, ``rmb()``, ``wmb()``} need a
+    comment in the source code that explains the logic of what they are doing
+    and why.
 
-25: If any ioctl's are added by the patch, then also update
-    Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt.
+25) If any ioctl's are added by the patch, then also update
+    ``Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt``.
 
-26: If your modified source code depends on or uses any of the kernel
-    APIs or features that are related to the following kconfig symbols,
-    then test multiple builds with the related kconfig symbols disabled
-    and/or =m (if that option is available) [not all of these at the
+26) If your modified source code depends on or uses any of the kernel
+    APIs or features that are related to the following ``Kconfig`` symbols,
+    then test multiple builds with the related ``Kconfig`` symbols disabled
+    and/or ``=m`` (if that option is available) [not all of these at the
     same time, just various/random combinations of them]:
 
-    CONFIG_SMP, CONFIG_SYSFS, CONFIG_PROC_FS, CONFIG_INPUT, CONFIG_PCI,
-    CONFIG_BLOCK, CONFIG_PM, CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ,
-    CONFIG_NET, CONFIG_INET=n (but latter with CONFIG_NET=y)
+    ``CONFIG_SMP``, ``CONFIG_SYSFS``, ``CONFIG_PROC_FS``, ``CONFIG_INPUT``, ``CONFIG_PCI``, ``CONFIG_BLOCK``, ``CONFIG_PM``, ``CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ``,
+    ``CONFIG_NET``, ``CONFIG_INET=n`` (but latter with ``CONFIG_NET=y``).
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists