[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e4b7075b-a1f7-74b1-ca62-4f3d2058fe97@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 06:17:50 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] openrisc: Support both old (or32) and new (or1k)
toolchain
On 09/19/2016 02:11 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2016 11:02 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> > Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>> > > If you plan to handle openrisc going forward, it would be great if you > could
>>> > consider updating MAINTAINERS. The web site and git repository have been > unreachable
>>> > for a long time.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Updating maintainers was kind of on my plans, but I figured I need to
>>> prove that I kind of know what I am doing.
>>>
>>
>> The alternative would be to mark it as Orphaned. Which, for all practical purpose,
>> would be the correct state right now.
>
> +CC The openrisc list
>
> Understood, I don't think we would want that to happen.
>
Look at the entry today:
OPENRISC ARCHITECTURE
M: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
W: http://openrisc.net
S: Maintained
T: git git://openrisc.net/~jonas/linux
F: arch/openrisc/
At the very least, W: and T: are incorrect and need to be updated or removed.
Plus, apparently there is a L:, and "T: https://github.com/openrisc/linux"
might be appropriate.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists