linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/7] openrisc: Support both old (or32) and new (or1k) toolchain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Sep 2016 06:17:50 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] openrisc: Support both old (or32) and new (or1k)
 toolchain

On 09/19/2016 02:11 AM, Stafford Horne wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> On 09/18/2016 11:02 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>  On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> >  Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>> > >  If you plan to handle openrisc going forward, it would be great if you >  could
>>> >  consider updating MAINTAINERS. The web site and git repository have been >  unreachable
>>> >  for a long time.
>>>
>>>  Thank you,
>>>  Updating maintainers was kind of on my plans, but I figured I need to
>>>  prove that I kind of know what I am doing.
>>>
>>
>> The alternative would be to mark it as Orphaned. Which, for all practical purpose,
>> would be the correct state right now.
>
> +CC The openrisc list
>
> Understood, I don't think we would want that to happen.
>
Look at the entry today:

OPENRISC ARCHITECTURE
M:      Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
W:      http://openrisc.net
S:      Maintained
T:      git git://openrisc.net/~jonas/linux
F:      arch/openrisc/

At the very least, W: and T: are incorrect and need to be updated or removed.
Plus, apparently there is a L:, and "T: https://github.com/openrisc/linux"
might be appropriate.

Guenter