[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqL_P2-2HY3eT=WU+-6-QgRcZ-09P1sSgQ=VW3m84snJpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:14:00 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] openrisc: remove the redundant of_platform_populate
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se> wrote:
> On 09/16/2016 04:43 PM, Stafford Horne wrote:
>>
>> From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>>
>> The of_platform_populate call in the openrisc arch code is now redundant
>> as the DT core provides a default call. Openrisc has a NULL match table
>> which means only top level nodes with compatible strings will have
>> devices creates. The default version will also descend nodes in the
>> match table such as "simple-bus" which should be fine as openrisc
>> doesn't have any of these (though it is preferred that memory-mapped
>> peripherals be grouped under a bus node(s)).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
>> Signed-off-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
>
>
> Yes, this is fine, but trivial/generic stuff like this doesn't really need
> to go via the OpenRISC repo, anyway.
Then which tree do you think it should go thru? I could have applied
it, but it doesn't depend on anything else. So it should go via the
correct maintainer's tree.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists