[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160919190415.26bd9343@griffin>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:04:15 +0200
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ptp_clock: allow for it to be optional
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:10:21 -0400 (EDT), Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ptp_clock_kernel.h
> @@ -207,7 +207,16 @@ int ptp_find_pin(struct ptp_clock *ptp,
> #else
> static inline struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock_register(struct ptp_clock_info *info,
> struct device *parent)
> -{ return NULL; }
> +{
> + if (IS_MODULE(CONFIG_PTP_1588_CLOCK)) {
> + pr_warn("%s is built-in while PTP clock subsystem is modular, "
> + "PTP clock ignored\n", KBUILD_MODNAME);
> + } else {
> + pr_warn("ignoring PTP clock from %s as PTP clock subsystem "
> + "is configured out\n", KBUILD_MODNAME);
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
I think the else part is not needed. If PTP is disabled, it is
disabled, nobody should be surprised by that. Looks good otherwise.
Thanks,
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists