[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1474277037-15200-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:23:52 -0400
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
waiman.long@....com, xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/6] pv-qspinlock: use cmpxchg_release in __pv_queued_spin_unlock
cmpxchg_release() is more lighweight than cmpxchg() on some archs(e.g.
PPC), moreover, in __pv_queued_spin_unlock() we only needs a RELEASE in
the fast path(pairing with *_try_lock() or *_lock()). And the slow path
has smp_store_release too. So it's safe to use cmpxchg_release here.
Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index 8a99abf..ce655aa 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock)
* unhash. Otherwise it would be possible to have multiple @lock
* entries, which would be BAD.
*/
- locked = cmpxchg(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
+ locked = cmpxchg_release(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0);
if (likely(locked == _Q_LOCKED_VAL))
return;
--
2.4.11
Powered by blists - more mailing lists