linux-kernel - Re: GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:30:28 +0200
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision
 mismatch in mid_get_vbt_data()

> If you restricted yourself to only sending bug fixes and not sending
> any more cleanups that would be good.

Thanks for another bit of constructive feedback.

> Please stop sending clean up patches.

This will not happen for a while.

I am in the process of informing various developers about some software
update opportunities. The proposed changes will belong to a mixture of error
categories as you observe them so far usually.

The involved static source code analysis will point more details out
for further considerations, won't it?

Regards,
Markus