linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k2e6lqnm.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:08:45 +0300
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] GPU-DRM-GMA500: One error message less for a GCT revision mismatch in mid_get_vbt_data()

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> Don't be a dummy...  This is easy to review an it fixes a bug.
>
> I'm fine with you NAKing all these patches based on who they are from.
> I mostly just delete these without responding because the guy has
> history of introducing bugs and never listens to feedback.  But asking
> pointless rhetorical questions is not helpful.
>
> A lot of people are CC'd and you're wasting everyone's time by asking
> questions where you know the answer.

Fair enough, sorry for the noise.

To be honest, I did only look at the patches, not who they were from. We
have CI for drm/i915, but I don't think it's constructive to keep
changing drivers like this where the upstream isn't actively developed
and tested. But I digress. It's up to Patrik anyway.

BR,
Jani.



-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center