lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6073ec6-3826-a4a1-b1ce-48106c012d43@nod.at>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:30:06 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>
Subject: Locking rules for fscrypt_operations->set_context()

Hi!

To my understanding ->setxattr() is always being called with i_mutex held.
->set_context() in ext4 stores the security context using ext4_xattr_set(),
but the fs crypto framework does not lock the inode itself.
So, depending on the call path, ext4_xattr_set() is sometimes being
called with i_mutex held and some times not.

What are the locking rules for fscrypt_operations and especially ->set_context()?

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ