linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/sun4i: dotclock: Round to closest clock rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160920072027.GC8719@lukather>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:20:27 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/sun4i: dotclock: Round to closest clock rate

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:36:18PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:14:02PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> With display pixel clocks we want to have the closest possible clock
> >> rate, to minimize timing and refresh rate skews. Whether the actual
> >> clock rate is higher or lower than the requested rate is less important.
> >>
> >> Also check candidates against the requested rate, rather than the
> >> ideal parent rate, the varying dividers also influence the difference
> >> between the requested rate and the rounded rate.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_dotclock.c | 3 ++-
> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_dotclock.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_dotclock.c
> >> index 3eb99784f371..d401156490f3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_dotclock.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_dotclock.c
> >> @@ -90,7 +90,8 @@ static long sun4i_dclk_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> >>                       goto out;
> >>               }
> >>
> >> -             if ((rounded < ideal) && (rounded > best_parent)) {
> >> +             if (abs(rate - rounded / i) <
> >> +                 abs(rate - best_parent / best_div)) {
> >
> > I'm not sure what you're trying to do here. Why is the divider involved?
> 
> Say you want the dotclock at X, so you try Y = 6 ~ 127 for the divider.
> Now you're asking the CCF to round (X*Y).
> 
> In the original code, you were comparing the result of rounding (X * Y).
> 
>                 if ((rounded < ideal) && (rounded > best_parent)) {
>                         best_parent = rounded;
>                         best_div = i;
>                 }
> 
> where ideal = X * Y (i in the code). Given the divider increases in
> the loop, you are actually not closing in on the best divider, but the
> highest divider that doesn't give a higher rate than the ideal rate.
> 
> Including the divider makes it compare the actual dot clock frequency
> if a given divider was used.
> 
> Does this makes sense? Explaining this kind of makes my head spin...

Yes, sorry, I didn't remember rounded was actually the rounded parent
rate.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)