linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for local NUMA mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1609201304450.134671@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Piotr Kwapulinski <kwapulinski.piotr@...il.com>
cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
        vbabka@...e.cz, mhocko@...nel.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
        liangchen.linux@...il.com, nzimmer@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: forbid static or relative flags for
 local NUMA mode

On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote:

> > There wasn't an MPOL_LOCAL when I introduced either of these flags, it's 
> > an oversight to allow them to be passed.
> > 
> > Want to try to update set_mempolicy(2) with the procedure outlined in 
> > https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/patches.html as well?
> Yes, why not ? I'll put a note about it.
> 

Thanks!  While you're hacking on this area and everything is familiar to 
you, I'm sure the man page would benefit from as extensive update as 
you're willing to do.