[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474339566.1954.25.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:46:06 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ceph Development <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: "CodingStyle: Clarify and complete chapter 7" in docs-next (was
Re: [PATCH 03/47] block-rbd: Adjust the position of a jump label in
rbd_header_from_disk())
On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 01:11 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> IMO what we need is to go through all rules in CodingStyle and if for
> some rule there is no overwhelming majority in the core kernel, well,
> the list has grown way too large and could use massive trimming.
I'm in complete agreement.
I also think that checkpatch's ERROR/WARNING/CHECK message naming is
far too severe and injunctive and could use a renaming to something
more silly, bug related and less commanding like FLEAS/GNATS/NITS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists