linux-kernel - Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJVTOCK8-zwDFvkQ=g+sC-HNFSuy5X2EFR03E-qdhXf2w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:17:36 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [INFO] ratio of const vs dynamic usercopy

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Kees,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.8-rc7 next-20160919]

Hah, and here I thought if I didn't mark it with "[PATCH]" 0-day would
skip it! ;)

Is there a way to mark "just FYI" patches that go to the list to get
skipped by 0-day?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security