[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921080942.GA476@swordfish>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:09:43 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: ssantosh@...nel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, isdn@...ux-pingi.de, mingo@...e.hu,
pebolle@...cali.nl, peterz@...radead.org,
salvatore.benedetto@...el.com, tadeusz.struk@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com
Subject: Re: + softirq-fix-tasklet_kill-and-its-users.patch added to -mm tree
didn't look into the issue, but this thing
> > tasklet_init() == Init and Enable scheduling
[..]
> > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ void tasklet_init(struct tasklet_struct
> > {
> > t->next = NULL;
> > t->state = 0;
> > - atomic_set(&t->count, 0);
> > + atomic_set(&t->count, 1);
^^^^^^^^
> > t->func = func;
> > t->data = data;
> > }
seems to be in conflict with
#define DECLARE_TASKLET(name, func, data) \
struct tasklet_struct name = { NULL, 0, ATOMIC_INIT(0), func, data }
^^^^^^^
#define DECLARE_TASKLET_DISABLED(name, func, data) \
struct tasklet_struct name = { NULL, 0, ATOMIC_INIT(1), func, data }
^^^^^^^
as well as with the tasklet_{disable, enable} helpers
static inline void tasklet_disable_nosync(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
atomic_inc(&t->count);
smp_mb__after_atomic();
}
static inline void tasklet_disable(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
tasklet_disable_nosync(t);
tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
smp_mb();
}
static inline void tasklet_enable(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_dec(&t->count);
}
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists