[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1474448633.2857.119.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:03:53 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Gavin Shan <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/7] net/faraday: Fix phy link irq on Aspeed G5
SoCs
On Wed, 2016-09-21 at 11:32 +0930, Joel Stanley wrote:
> I had a look at the eval board schematic and it appears that the line
> has pull down resistors on it, explaining why the IRQ fires when it's
> configured to active low. Other machines re-use the pin pin as a GPIO.
> So yes, I will change this to a dt property in v2. That will mean
> dropping 4/7 "net/faraday: Avoid PHYSTS_CHG interrupt" as well.
What line is it out of the PHY ? The PHY IRQ ? If yes then it's meant
to be telling you to go look at the PHY registers for a link status
change, but only works if the PHY has also been configured
appropriately...
Mostly we ignore those things in Linux and just poll the PHY.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists