[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921120720.kxctrzjxjpo2zkv7@treble>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 07:07:20 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags
handling
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:47:22PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> The commit 66cc69e34e86a231 ("Fix: module signature vs tracepoints:
> add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE") updated module_taint_flags() to
> potentially print one more character. But it did not increase the
> size of the corresponding buffers in m_show() and print_modules().
>
> We have recently done the same mistake when adding a taint flag
> for livepatching, see
> https://lkml.kernel.org/g/cfba2c823bb984690b73572aaae1db596b54a082.1472137475.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
No objections to the patch itself, but this link didn't work for me.
Replacing the 'g' with 'r' fixed it:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cfba2c823bb984690b73572aaae1db596b54a082.1472137475.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Or, even better, I think Jiri doesn't rebase his livepatching 'for-next'
branch, so maybe just use the commit id:
2992ef29ae01 ("livepatch/module: make TAINT_LIVEPATCH module-specific")
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists