lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:29:44 +0200 From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Cc: axboe@...com, tglx@...utronix.de, keith.busch@...el.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading infrastructure On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:18:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > +/** > + * irq_calc_affinity_vectors - Calculate to optimal number of vectors for a given affinity mask > + * @affinity: The affinity mask to spread. If NULL cpu_online_mask > + * is used > + * @maxvec: The maximum number of vectors available > + */ > +int irq_calc_affinity_vectors(const struct cpumask *affinity, int maxvec) > +{ > + int cpus, ret; > + > + /* Stabilize the cpumasks */ > + get_online_cpus(); > + /* If the supplied affinity mask is NULL, use cpu online mask */ > + if (!affinity) > + affinity = cpu_online_mask; > + > + cpus = cpumask_weight(affinity); Should not we consider the result of AND of affinity and cpu_online_mask? > + ret = (cpus < maxvec) ? cpus : maxvec; > + > + put_online_cpus(); > + return ret; > +} > + > static int get_first_sibling(unsigned int cpu) > { > unsigned int ret; > -- > 2.1.4 >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists