[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB5PR0401MB1925CDF6CBD45ACBEE95D152F5F60@DB5PR0401MB1925.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:43:59 +0000
From: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@....com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>,
"Leo Li" <pku.leo@...il.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
"Scott Wood" <oss@...error.net>,
David Fisher <david.fisher1@...opsys.com>,
"Thang Q. Nguyen" <tqnguyen@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Suresh Gupta <suresh.gupta@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent
dev
>From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd@...db.de]
>On Wednesday, September 21, 2016 11:06:47 AM CEST Sriram Dash wrote:
>>
>> Hello Arnd,
>>
>> We tried this patch on NXP platforms (ls2085 and ls1043) which use
>> dwc3 controller without any glue layer. On first go, this did not
>> work. But after minimal reworks mention snippet below, we are able to
>> verify that the USB was working OK.
>>
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 12 ++++++------
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>>
>> - struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
>> + struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
>>
>> We believe the patch needs little modification to work or there might
>> be chances we may have missed something. Any idea?
>
>
>I had not tried the patch, it was just sent for clarification what I meant, so I'm glad
>you got it working with just minimal changes.
>
>Unfortunately, I can't tell from your lines above what exactly you changed, can you
>send that again as a proper patch?
>
Sure.
==============================================================
>From 8b0dea1513e9e73a11dcfa802ddc71cca11d66f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@....com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:39:30 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] usb: xhci: Fix the patch inherit dma configuration from
parent dev
Fixes the patch https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9319527/
("usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev").
Signed-off-by: Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@....com>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 12 ++++++------
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
index 6afe323..79608df 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static void xhci_free_stream_ctx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
unsigned int num_stream_ctxs,
struct xhci_stream_ctx *stream_ctx, dma_addr_t dma)
{
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
size_t size = sizeof(struct xhci_stream_ctx) * num_stream_ctxs;
if (size > MEDIUM_STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE)
@@ -614,7 +614,7 @@ static struct xhci_stream_ctx *xhci_alloc_stream_ctx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
unsigned int num_stream_ctxs, dma_addr_t *dma,
gfp_t mem_flags)
{
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
size_t size = sizeof(struct xhci_stream_ctx) * num_stream_ctxs;
if (size > MEDIUM_STREAM_ARRAY_SIZE)
@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ void xhci_slot_copy(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
static int scratchpad_alloc(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
{
int i;
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
int num_sp = HCS_MAX_SCRATCHPAD(xhci->hcs_params2);
xhci_dbg_trace(xhci, trace_xhci_dbg_init,
@@ -1716,7 +1716,7 @@ static void scratchpad_free(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
int num_sp;
int i;
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
if (!xhci->scratchpad)
return;
@@ -1792,7 +1792,7 @@ void xhci_free_command(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
void xhci_mem_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
int size;
int i, j, num_ports;
@@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_port_arrays(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
int xhci_mem_init(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t flags)
{
dma_addr_t dma;
- struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
unsigned int val, val2;
u64 val_64;
struct xhci_segment *seg;
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index 01d96c9..9a1ff09 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int xhci_free_msi(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
static int xhci_setup_msi(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
int ret;
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller);
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev);
ret = pci_enable_msi(pdev);
if (ret) {
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msi(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
*/
static void xhci_free_irq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller);
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev);
int ret;
/* return if using legacy interrupt */
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msix(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
int i, ret = 0;
struct usb_hcd *hcd = xhci_to_hcd(xhci);
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(hcd->self.controller);
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(hcd->self.sysdev);
/*
* calculate number of msi-x vectors supported.
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ free_entries:
static void xhci_cleanup_msix(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
{
struct usb_hcd *hcd = xhci_to_hcd(xhci);
- struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(hcd->self.controller);
+ struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(hcd->self.sysdev);
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_PLAT)
return;
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int xhci_try_enable_msi(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_PLAT)
return 0;
- pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.controller);
+ pdev = to_pci_dev(xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev);
/*
* Some Fresco Logic host controllers advertise MSI, but fail to
* generate interrupts. Don't even try to enable MSI.
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ void xhci_shutdown(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
struct xhci_hcd *xhci = hcd_to_xhci(hcd);
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_SPURIOUS_REBOOT)
- usb_disable_xhci_ports(to_pci_dev(hcd->self.controller));
+ usb_disable_xhci_ports(to_pci_dev(hcd->self.sysdev));
spin_lock_irq(&xhci->lock);
xhci_halt(xhci);
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ void xhci_shutdown(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
/* Yet another workaround for spurious wakeups at shutdown with HSW */
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_SPURIOUS_WAKEUP)
- pci_set_power_state(to_pci_dev(hcd->self.controller), PCI_D3hot);
+ pci_set_power_state(to_pci_dev(hcd->self.sysdev), PCI_D3hot);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
@@ -3605,7 +3605,7 @@ void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
* if no devices remain.
*/
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME)
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(hcd->self.controller);
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(hcd->self.sysdev);
#endif
ret = xhci_check_args(hcd, udev, NULL, 0, true, __func__);
@@ -3745,7 +3745,7 @@ int xhci_alloc_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev)
* suspend if there is a device attached.
*/
if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME)
- pm_runtime_get_noresume(hcd->self.controller);
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(hcd->self.sysdev);
#endif
@@ -4834,7 +4834,7 @@ int xhci_get_frame(struct usb_hcd *hcd)
int xhci_gen_setup(struct usb_hcd *hcd, xhci_get_quirks_t get_quirks)
{
struct xhci_hcd *xhci;
- struct device *dev = hcd->self.controller;
+ struct device *dev = hcd->self.sysdev;
int retval;
/* Accept arbitrarily long scatter-gather lists */
--
2.1.0
==============================================================
>I think I also had some minimal changes that I did myself in order to fix a build
>regression I introduced.
>
> Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists