[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921171348.GF24210@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:13:50 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <a.miskiewicz@...il.com>,
Ralf-Peter Rohbeck <Ralf-Peter.Rohbeck@...ntum.com>,
Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm, compaction: more reliably increase direct
compaction priority
On Tue 06-09-16 15:52:56, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
[...]
> @@ -3204,6 +3199,15 @@ should_compact_retry(struct alloc_context *ac, int order, int alloc_flags,
> if (compaction_retries <= max_retries)
> return true;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure there is at least one attempt at the highest priority
> + * if we exhausted all retries at the lower priorities
> + */
> +check_priority:
> + if (*compact_priority > MIN_COMPACT_PRIORITY) {
> + (*compact_priority)--;
> + return true;
Don't we want to reset compaction_retries here? Otherwise we can consume
all retries on the lower priorities.
Other than that it looks good to me. With that you can add
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> + }
> return false;
> }
> #else
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists