[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160921035226.GE2609@localhost>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:22:26 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: dan.j.williams@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Use enum for crossbar
type
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:33:23AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Fixes compiler warning on 64bit architectures.
Would be good to give the warning message here
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> index e4f3bd1ae264..876e4ccaf033 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
> @@ -16,8 +16,10 @@
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/of_dma.h>
>
> -#define TI_XBAR_DRA7 0
> -#define TI_XBAR_AM335X 1
> +enum ti_xbar_type {
> + TI_XBAR_DRA7 = 0,
> + TI_XBAR_AM335X,
> +};
>
> static const struct of_device_id ti_dma_xbar_match[] = {
> {
> @@ -395,7 +397,7 @@ static int ti_dra7_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> xbar->dmarouter.dev = &pdev->dev;
> xbar->dmarouter.route_free = ti_dra7_xbar_free;
> - xbar->dma_offset = (u32)match->data;
> + xbar->dma_offset = (enum ti_xbar_type)match->data;
>
> mutex_init(&xbar->mutex);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, xbar);
> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@ static int ti_dma_xbar_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (unlikely(!match))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - switch ((u32)match->data) {
> + switch ((enum ti_xbar_type)match->data) {
> case TI_XBAR_DRA7:
> ret = ti_dra7_xbar_probe(pdev);
> break;
> --
> 2.10.0
>
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists