[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160921222946.on4jcxgk7nerrbh4@arbab-laptop>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:29:46 -0500
From: Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@....ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on powerpc
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:13:37PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>So we are looking at two step online process here. The above explained
>the details nicely. Can you capture these details in the commit message. ie,
>to say that when using 'echo online-movable > state' we allow the move from
>normal to movable only if movable node is set. Also you may want to
>mention that we still don't support the auto-online to movable.
Sure, no problem. I'll use a more verbose commit message in v3.
--
Reza Arbab
Powered by blists - more mailing lists