[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <483bea3c-a1b4-ce5d-e720-d69fc943ab50@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:24:30 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: compatible is an optional property
On 09/21/2016 02:32 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> It was never compulsory to have a compatible string in the OPP table.
> Fix the documentation to mark it optional.
>
> Also update its description a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
Why? I'd prefer the compatible string to be required so we know what
sort of node it is.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists