[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84473086-ba97-64c9-ae4d-40bbe82eeef6@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 11:35:31 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Scott Mayhew <smayhew@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NFSD: notifiers registration cleanup
On 21.09.2016 16:20, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Good catch. I'm not very fond of the refcounting this here but it
> should
> serve the purpose and I don't have anything better to suggest. FWIW, I
> think the nfsd_mutex is held during all of these operations so we
> probably don't need atomics for the refcount.
I've copied idea from netfilters,
look at using of masquerade_notifier_refcount
Perhaps someday in future we'll replace all such cases by some common primitive.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists