lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160922170651.GB27704@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:06:51 +0100
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Call numa_store_cpu_info() earlier.

On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:46:35AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
> 
> The wq_numa_init() function makes a private CPU to node map by calling
> cpu_to_node() early in the boot process, before the non-boot CPUs are
> brought online.  Since the default implementation of cpu_to_node()
> returns zero for CPUs that have never been brought online, the
> workqueue system's view is that *all* CPUs are on node zero.
> 
> When the unbound workqueue for a non-zero node is created, the
> tsk_cpus_allowed() for the worker threads is the empty set because
> there are, in the view of the workqueue system, no CPUs on non-zero
> nodes.  The code in try_to_wake_up() using this empty cpumask ends up
> using the cpumask empty set value of NR_CPUS as an index into the
> per-CPU area pointer array, and gets garbage as it is one past the end
> of the array.  This results in:

Queued for 4.8. Thanks.

-- 
Catalin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ